The only agent that thinks for itself

Autonomous Monitoring with self-learning AI built-in, operating independently across your entire stack.

Unlimited Metrics & Logs
Machine learning & MCP
5% CPU, 150MB RAM
3GB disk, >1 year retention
800+ integrations, zero config
Dashboards, alerts out of the box
> Discover Netdata Agents

Centralized metrics streaming and storage

Aggregate metrics from multiple agents into centralized Parent nodes for unified monitoring across your infrastructure.

Stream from unlimited agents
Long-term data retention
High availability clustering
Data replication & backup
Scalable architecture
Enterprise-grade security
> Learn about Parents

Fully managed cloud platform

Access your monitoring data from anywhere with our SaaS platform. No infrastructure to manage, automatic updates, and global availability.

Zero infrastructure management
99.9% uptime SLA
Global data centers
Automatic updates & patches
Enterprise SSO & RBAC
SOC2 & ISO certified
> Explore Netdata Cloud

Deploy Netdata Cloud in your infrastructure

Run the full Netdata Cloud platform on-premises for complete data sovereignty and compliance with your security policies.

Complete data sovereignty
Air-gapped deployment
Custom compliance controls
Private network integration
Dedicated support team
Kubernetes & Docker support
> Learn about Cloud On-Premises

Powerful, intuitive monitoring interface

Modern, responsive UI built for real-time troubleshooting with customizable dashboards and advanced visualization capabilities.

Real-time chart updates
Customizable dashboards
Dark & light themes
Advanced filtering & search
Responsive on all devices
Collaboration features
> Explore Netdata UI

Monitor on the go

Native iOS and Android apps bring full monitoring capabilities to your mobile device with real-time alerts and notifications.

iOS & Android apps
Push notifications
Touch-optimized interface
Offline data access
Biometric authentication
Widget support
> Download apps

The future of infrastructure observability

See our strategic direction across AI-native observability, full-stack signals, operational intelligence, and enterprise platform maturity.

AI-native observability
Full-stack signal coverage
Operational intelligence
Enterprise platform maturity
Agent releases every 6 weeks
Cloud continuous delivery
> Explore Product Roadmap

Best energy efficiency

True real-time per-second

100% automated zero config

Centralized observability

Multi-year retention

High availability built-in

Zero maintenance

Always up-to-date

Enterprise security

Complete data control

Air-gap ready

Compliance certified

Millisecond responsiveness

Infinite zoom & pan

Works on any device

Native performance

Instant alerts

Monitor anywhere

AI-native observability

Continuous delivery

Open source foundation

80% Faster Incident Resolution

AI-powered troubleshooting from detection, to root cause and blast radius identification, to reporting.

True Real-Time and Simple, even at Scale

Linearly and infinitely scalable full-stack observability, that can be deployed even mid-crisis.

90% Cost Reduction, Full Fidelity

Instead of centralizing the data, Netdata distributes the code, eliminating pipelines and complexity.

See and Map Your Entire Network

Live topology, flow analytics, and SNMP device and trap monitoring — unified with your full-stack observability.

Control Without Surrender

SOC 2 Type 2 certified with every metric kept on your infrastructure.

Integrations

800+ collectors and notification channels, auto-discovered and ready out of the box.

800+ data collectors
Auto-discovery & zero config
Cloud, infra, app protocols
Notifications out of the box
> Explore integrations
Real Results
46% Cost Reduction

Reduced monitoring costs by 46% while cutting staff overhead by 67%.

— Leonardo Antunez, Codyas

Zero Pipeline

No data shipping. No central storage costs. Query at the edge.

From Our Users
"Out-of-the-Box"

So many out-of-the-box features! I mostly don't have to develop anything.

— Simon Beginn, LANCOM Systems

No Query Language

Point-and-click troubleshooting. No PromQL, no LogQL, no learning curve.

Enterprise Ready
67% Less Staff, 46% Cost Cut

Enterprise efficiency without enterprise complexity—real ROI from day one.

— Leonardo Antunez, Codyas

SOC 2 Type 2 Certified

Zero data egress. Only metadata reaches the cloud. Your metrics stay on your infrastructure.

Full Coverage
800+ Collectors

Auto-discovered and configured. No manual setup required.

Any Notification Channel

Slack, PagerDuty, Teams, email, webhooks—all built-in.

Built for the People Who Get Paged

Because 3am alerts deserve instant answers, not hour-long hunts.

Every Industry Has Rules. We Master Them.

See how healthcare, finance, and government teams cut monitoring costs 90% while staying audit-ready.

Monitor Any Technology. Configure Nothing.

Install the agent. It already knows your stack.
From Our Users
"A Rare Unicorn"

Netdata gives more than you invest in it. A rare unicorn that obeys the Pareto rule.

— Eduard Porquet Mateu, TMB Barcelona

99% Downtime Reduction

Reduced website downtime by 99% and cloud bill by 30% using Netdata alerts.

— Falkland Islands Government

Real Savings
30% Cloud Cost Reduction

Optimized resource allocation based on Netdata alerts cut cloud spending by 30%.

— Falkland Islands Government

46% Cost Cut

Reduced monitoring staff by 67% while cutting operational costs by 46%.

— Codyas

Real Coverage
"Plugin for Everything"

Netdata has agent capacity or a plugin for everything, including Windows and Kubernetes.

— Eduard Porquet Mateu, TMB Barcelona

"Out-of-the-Box"

So many out-of-the-box features! I mostly don't have to develop anything.

— Simon Beginn, LANCOM Systems

Real Speed
Troubleshooting in 30 Seconds

From 2-3 minutes to 30 seconds—instant visibility into any node issue.

— Matthew Artist, Nodecraft

20% Downtime Reduction

20% less downtime and 40% budget optimization from out-of-the-box monitoring.

— Simon Beginn, LANCOM Systems

Pay per Node. Unlimited Everything Else.

One price per node. Unlimited metrics, logs, users, and retention. No per-GB surprises.

Free tier—forever
No metric limits or caps
Retention you control
Cancel anytime
> See pricing plans

What's Your Monitoring Really Costing You?

Most teams overpay by 40-60%. Let's find out why.

Expose hidden metric charges
Calculate tool consolidation
Customers report 30-67% savings
Results in under 60 seconds
> See what you're really paying

Your Infrastructure Is Unique. Let's Talk.

Because monitoring 10 nodes is different from monitoring 10,000.

On-prem & air-gapped deployment
Volume pricing & agreements
Architecture review for your scale
Compliance & security support
> Start a conversation

Monitoring That Sells Itself

Deploy in minutes. Impress clients in hours. Earn recurring revenue for years.

30-second live demos close deals
Zero config = zero support burden
Competitive margins & deal protection
Response in 48 hours
> Apply to partner

Per-Second Metrics at Homelab Prices

Same engine, same dashboards, same ML. Just priced for tinkerers.

Community: Free forever · 5 nodes · non-commercial
Homelab: $90/yr · unlimited nodes · fair usage
> Get the Homelab Plan

$1,000 Per Referral. Unlimited Referrals.

Your colleagues get 10% off. You get 10% commission. Everyone wins.

10% of subscriptions, up to $1,000 each
Track earnings inside Netdata Cloud
PayPal/Venmo payouts in 3-4 weeks
No caps, no complexity
> Get your referral link
Cost Proof
40% Budget Optimization

"Netdata's significant positive impact" — LANCOM Systems

Calculate Your Savings

Compare vs Datadog, Grafana, Dynatrace

Savings Proof
46% Cost Reduction

"Cut costs by 46%, staff by 67%" — Codyas

30% Cloud Bill Savings

"Reduced cloud bill by 30%" — Falkland Islands Gov

Enterprise Proof
"Better Than Combined Alternatives"

"Better observability with Netdata than combining other tools." — TMB Barcelona

Real Engineers, <24h Response

DPA, SLAs, on-prem, volume pricing

Why Partners Win
Demo Live Infrastructure

One command, 30 seconds, real data—no sandbox needed

Zero Tickets, High Margins

Auto-config + per-node pricing = predictable profit

Homelab Ready
Free Video Course

8-episode Netdata tutorial by LearnLinux.tv

76k+ GitHub Stars

3rd most starred monitoring project

Worth Recommending
Product That Delivers

Customers report 40-67% cost cuts, 99% downtime reduction

Zero Risk to Your Rep

Free tier lets them try before they buy

AI Support Assistant, Available 24/7

Nedi has access to all official documentation, source code, and resources. Ask any question about Netdata—responds in your language.

Deployment & configuration
Troubleshooting & sizing
Alerts & notifications
Evidence-based answers
> Ask Nedi now

Never Fight Fires Alone

Docs, community, and expert help—pick your path to resolution.

Learn.netdata.cloud docs
Discord, Forums, GitHub
Premium support available
> Get answers now

60 Seconds to First Dashboard

One command to install. Zero config. 850+ integrations documented.

Linux, Windows, K8s, Docker
Auto-discovers your stack
> Read our documentation

76,000+ Engineers Strong

615+ contributors. 1.5M daily downloads. One mission: simplify observability.

Per-Second. 90% Cheaper. Data Stays Home.

Side-by-side comparisons: costs, real-time granularity, and data sovereignty for every major tool.

See why teams switch from Datadog, Prometheus, Grafana, and more.

> Browse all comparisons
Edge-Native Observability, Born Open Source
Per-second visibility, ML on every metric, and data that never leaves your infrastructure.
Founded in 2016
615+ contributors worldwide
Remote-first, engineering-driven
Open source first
> Read our story
Promises We Publish—and Prove
12 principles backed by open code, independent validation, and measurable outcomes.
Open source, peer-reviewed
Zero config, instant value
Data sovereignty by design
Aligned pricing, no surprises
> See all 12 principles
Edge-Native, AI-Ready, 100% Open
76k+ stars. Full ML, AI, and automation—GPLv3+, not premium add-ons.
76,000+ GitHub stars
GPLv3+ licensed forever
ML on every metric, included
Zero vendor lock-in
> Explore our open source
Build Real-Time Observability for the World
Remote-first team shipping per-second monitoring with ML on every metric.
Remote-first, fully distributed
Open source (76k+ stars)
Challenging technical problems
Your code on millions of systems
> See open roles
Meet the Team Behind Netdata
Conferences, meetups, and tradeshows where you can see Netdata in action and talk to the engineers who build it.
Live demos and deep dives
Book 1-on-1 meetings
Talks and panel sessions
Event recaps and photos
> See all events
Talk to a Netdata Human in <24 Hours
Sales, partnerships, press, or professional services—real engineers, fast answers.
Discuss your observability needs
Pricing and volume discounts
Partnership opportunities
Media and press inquiries
> Book a conversation
Your Data. Your Rules.
On-prem data, cloud control plane, transparent terms.
Trust & Scale
76,000+ GitHub Stars

One of the most popular open-source monitoring projects

SOC 2 Type 2 Certified

Enterprise-grade security and compliance

Data Sovereignty

Your metrics stay on your infrastructure

Validated
University of Amsterdam

"Most energy-efficient monitoring solution" — ICSOC 2023, peer-reviewed

ADASTEC (Autonomous Driving)

"Doesn't miss alerts—mission-critical trust for safety software"

Community Stats
615+ Contributors

Global community improving monitoring for everyone

1.5M+ Downloads/Day

Trusted by teams worldwide

GPLv3+ Licensed

Free forever, fully open source agent

Why Join?
Remote-First

Work from anywhere, async-friendly culture

Impact at Scale

Your work helps millions of systems

$ guides / zookeeper / zookeeper-proposal-commit-divergence

Operations Guides

ZooKeeper proposals not committing: proposal_count outpacing commit_count

In a healthy ZooKeeper ensemble, every proposal the leader broadcasts is committed a few milliseconds later, after a quorum of followers acknowledges it. The two counters zk_proposal_count and zk_commit_count track the front and back of that pipeline, and on a cluster with active writers their rates should track each other closely.

When zk_proposal_count keeps climbing but zk_commit_count stalls, the leader is generating proposals but cannot reach quorum ACK. Writes are not landing. Clients with operation timeouts start failing, ephemeral nodes are not being created, and dependent systems (Kafka controller, HBase master, Solr overseer) start logging “operation timeout” or “session expired”. A worse signal is both metrics staying flat while writers are active: the write pipeline is fully blocked, or the leader is isolated from the quorum.

The signal pairs you need are zk_quorum_ack_latency, zk_synced_followers, zk_pending_syncs, and per-follower zk_fsynctime and zk_jvm_pause_time_ms. Both counters are leader-only; on ZK 3.6.0+ they are part of the standard mntr output, and on 3.4.x / 3.5.x they are not available via mntr (JMX only).

What this means

The ZAB protocol only commits a proposal after the leader receives an ACK from a quorum of servers, including itself. The leader’s proposal stage and commit stage are separate, so under contention the two rates can briefly diverge. A sustained divergence means one of:

  • A quorum of followers cannot ACK fast enough (slow disk, GC, or network).
  • The quorum has shrunk because followers dropped out.
  • The leader believes it has quorum but is not actually committing (version-specific bugs).
  • The leader is isolated from the writers (writes are not even reaching the proposal stage).

The shape of the divergence narrows the diagnosis:

PatternLikely cause
proposal_count rising, commit_count slow but non-zeroFollowers ACKing too slowly; quorum ACK latency is the bottleneck
proposal_count rising, commit_count flatQuorum cannot ACK, or the leader’s commit processor is blocked
Both flat with active writersLeader unreachable from clients, or write pipeline fully stalled

A divergence for less than a second is normal burst behavior. Anything sustained beyond a few seconds during active write load is a problem.

Common causes

CauseWhat it looks likeFirst thing to check
Follower disk I/O saturationzk_quorum_ack_latency p99 high; follower zk_fsynctime p99 elevatediostat -x on follower txnlog disk
Follower GC pausesACK latency spiky; follower zk_jvm_pause_time_ms (3.7+) highGC log on the slow follower
Degraded quorumzk_synced_followers below expected; zk_followers below N-1Network connectivity between leader and followers
Network degradation between leader and followerszk_quorum_ack_latency rising; no host-level disk or GC issueInter-node RTT, packet retransmissions
allowedToCommit=false bug (ZK 3.5.8, 3.6.1)Leader logs quorum messages but never commitsZK version; ZOOKEEPER-3830
DNS binding stuck on leader (ZK 3.6.4)Leader binds to <unresolved> address; quorum never forms cleanlyZK version; ZOOKEEPER-4728
Leader isolated from clientsBoth proposal_count and commit_count flat; clients timing outClient-side error rate; leader client-port reachability

Quick checks

Run these on the leader first, then on each follower. They are all read-only.

# Identify the leader (run on every node)
echo srvr | nc localhost 2181 | grep Mode

# Confirm divergence is real (run twice, a few seconds apart)
echo mntr | nc localhost 2181 | grep -E 'zk_(proposal|commit)_count'

# Check quorum health on the leader
echo mntr | nc localhost 2181 | grep -E 'zk_(followers|synced_followers|pending_syncs)'

# Check quorum ACK latency on the leader
echo mntr | nc localhost 2181 | grep -E 'zk_.*quorum_ack_latency'

# Check write-mode status (rw = healthy, ro = quorum lost)
echo isro | nc localhost 2181

# Check pipeline saturation
echo mntr | nc localhost 2181 | grep -E 'zk_(outstanding_requests|sync_processor_queue_size)'

# Compare zxids across nodes (run on every node); mntr does not expose zxid
echo srvr | nc localhost 2181 | grep Zxid

# Check fsync latency on followers (the ACK bottleneck is often here)
echo mntr | nc localhost 2181 | grep -E 'zk_.*fsynctime'

# Check JVM pauses on followers
echo mntr | nc localhost 2181 | grep -E 'zk_.*jvm_pause'

zk_proposal_count, zk_followers, zk_synced_followers, zk_pending_syncs, and zk_*quorum_ack_latency* are leader-only. Querying a follower returns nothing for these. Either target the leader explicitly, or query all nodes and filter for the one whose Mode is leader.

How to diagnose it

  1. Identify the leader. Run echo srvr | nc <host> 2181 | grep Mode on each node. If no node reports leader, you do not have a divergence problem, you have quorum loss. See ZooKeeper quorum loss.

  2. Confirm the divergence is sustained. Sample zk_proposal_count and zk_commit_count at least three times over 15 seconds. Compute rates from deltas. The raw counters are monotonically increasing since process start, so absolute values are not useful.

  3. Check quorum size and follower sync status. On the leader:

    • If zk_followers < N - 1, a follower is disconnected. Investigate the network or the missing follower’s process.
    • If zk_synced_followers < zk_followers, a connected follower has not caught up. Check zk_pending_syncs and the lagging follower’s disk and GC.
    • If zk_synced_followers equals floor(N/2), the ensemble is one failure away from going read-only.
  4. Check quorum ACK latency. If zk_quorum_ack_latency is elevated (above single-digit milliseconds on a LAN, or trending upward), followers are ACKing slowly. mntr exposes it as avg/min/max/cnt/sum plus p50/p95/p99/p999 (3.6+). Cross-reference with per-follower zk_fsynctime and zk_jvm_pause_time_ms to find the slow follower.

  5. Compare zxids across the ensemble. Run echo srvr | nc <host> 2181 | grep Zxid on every node (mntr does not expose zxid). The leader and synced followers should report identical zxids. A follower with a lower zxid is behind. zxid is a 64-bit value where the upper 32 bits are the epoch (incremented on each election) and the lower 32 bits are the transaction counter, so compare within the same epoch first.

  6. Check for version-specific bugs if the previous steps do not localize the problem:

    • ZK 3.5.8 or 3.6.1 with a recent ensemble expansion: check the leader log for “Have quorum of supporters” without subsequent commits. This is the allowedToCommit=false bug, ZOOKEEPER-3830, fixed in 3.5.9, 3.6.2, and 3.7.0.
    • ZK 3.6.4 in environments where DNS may not be ready at startup (notably Kubernetes): check the log for “Couldn’t bind to /”. This is ZOOKEEPER-4728, fixed in 3.8.4, 3.9.2, and 3.10.0 (ZOOKEEPER-5026, a related unresolved issue, remains open with no fix version).
  7. Check whether writers can reach the leader. If both proposal_count and commit_count are flat while clients are reporting errors, the leader may be isolated from clients even though it has internal quorum. That is a different failure from the leader being unable to reach followers.

flowchart TD
    A[proposal rate > commit rate on leader] --> B{synced_followers below expected?}
    B -- Yes --> C[Degraded quorum]
    B -- No --> D{quorum_ack_latency elevated?}
    D -- Yes --> E[Follower disk, GC, or network]
    D -- No --> F{Both rates zero with active writers?}
    F -- Yes --> G[Leader isolated from clients]
    F -- No --> H[Check version-specific commit bugs]
    C --> C1[Network partition or follower crash]
    E --> E1[Follower fsync, JVM pause, or RTT]

Metrics and signals to monitor

SignalWhy it mattersWarning sign
zk_proposal_count rate vs zk_commit_count ratePrimary divergence signalSustained gap beyond a few seconds
zk_quorum_ack_latency (leader)Time for leader to gather ACKsTrending upward; above low-double-digit ms on LAN
zk_synced_followers (leader)How many followers are caught upBelow ensemble_size - 1
zk_followers (leader)How many followers are connectedBelow ensemble_size - 1
zk_pending_syncs (leader)Outstanding sync operationsSustained non-zero
Zxid (via srvr/stat, not mntr)Cross-node replication lagFollower zxid behind leader
zk_outstanding_requestsPipeline saturationGrowing on leader
zk_fsynctime per followerDisk bottleneck for ACKsTrending up
zk_jvm_pause_time_ms per follower (3.7+)GC blocking ACKsAbove 100 ms or growing
zk_sum_leader_unavailable_time (3.7+)Cumulative write unavailabilityAny non-zero delta

Fixes

Triage by the cause the diagnosis pointed at. None of these should be the first action during an outage; the first action is to identify which subsystem is failing so you do not mask the root cause.

Slow follower disk

If a follower’s zk_fsynctime is the bottleneck for quorum ACK, the txnlog disk is saturated. Short term, identify and stop whatever is competing for I/O on that disk (backups, co-located workloads). Structural fixes:

  • Configure dataLogDir on a dedicated low-latency device, separate from dataDir.
  • On cloud, increase provisioned IOPS or move the txnlog to a higher tier.
  • Confirm autopurge.purgeInterval and autopurge.snapRetainCount are set so log accumulation is not contributing.

Restarting the slow follower will not fix the disk; it will only trigger a SNAP sync when it rejoins, which loads the leader further. See ZooKeeper fsync warning for the related write-stall pattern.

Follower GC pauses

If zk_jvm_pause_time_ms (3.7+) on a follower is high, the follower’s JVM is freezing during ACKs. Address the heap: enable GC logging, confirm heap is sized for the data tree, and consider moving from CMS or Parallel to G1GC, or to ZGC on JDK 15+. Confirm Transparent Huge Pages is set to never on the host. GC pauses are also a common trigger for unnecessary leader elections, which compounds the original divergence.

Degraded quorum

If zk_followers or zk_synced_followers is below expected, the fix is to restore the missing follower: restart the process, fix the network, free disk, or address whatever caused it to drop. Do not force a leader re-election hoping it will help; re-election loses in-flight proposals and lengthens the outage. See ZooKeeper server stuck in LOOKING when a follower cannot rejoin.

Network degradation between leader and followers

If zk_quorum_ack_latency is high but no single host shows disk or GC problems, suspect the network. Check inter-node RTT, packet retransmissions on the quorum ports, and any recent security group or firewall change. Both the follower-to-leader port and the election port must be reachable; a blocked election port is silent until the next election.

Version-specific commit bugs

If the diagnosis points at allowedToCommit=false (ZK 3.5.8 or 3.6.1, ZOOKEEPER-3830) or DNS binding stuck (ZK 3.6.4, ZOOKEEPER-4728), the only durable fix is to upgrade to a release that contains the fix: 3.5.9, 3.6.2, or 3.7.0 for the allowedToCommit bug; 3.8.4, 3.9.2, or 3.10.0 for the DNS binding bug (ZOOKEEPER-5026, a follow-up issue, remains open). As a workaround for the DNS binding bug in Kubernetes, Strimzi documented using 0.0.0.0 for the local server address in server.X configuration, or delaying ZooKeeper startup until the pod hostname resolves (strimzi/strimzi-kafka-operator#8675).

Leader isolated from clients

If both rates are flat and clients are timing out, the leader may be unreachable from clients even though it has internal quorum. Check client-side error rates, load balancer or DNS health, and network ACLs between client subnets and the leader’s client port (default 2181).

Prevention

  • Alert on the rate gap, not the absolute counters. Compute rate(zk_proposal_count[1m]) - rate(zk_commit_count[1m]) and alert on any sustained non-zero value during active write load.
  • Alert on zk_synced_followers at the quorum threshold. For an N-node ensemble, page when zk_synced_followers == floor(N/2), because one more failure stops writes.
  • Track zk_quorum_ack_latency as a leading indicator. A creeping baseline predicts the next divergence incident.
  • Keep ZK patched. The allowedToCommit and DNS binding bugs are silent until triggered by ensemble expansion or a pod restart; stay on a fixed release.
  • Run mixed-version checks before expanding the ensemble. Adding a node running a version affected by ZOOKEEPER-3830 is a known trigger.
  • Confirm dataLogDir is on dedicated storage on every node. The most common slow-ACK cause is shared disk on a follower.
  • Exercise follower restarts in a controlled window. SNAP sync behavior under load is something you want to have observed before an incident, not during one.

How Netdata helps

  • Per-second collection of zk_proposal_count and zk_commit_count surfaces the rate gap within seconds of onset, rather than at a 30- or 60-second scrape interval where short divergences are invisible.
  • Leader-aware collection surfaces zk_followers, zk_synced_followers, zk_pending_syncs, and zk_quorum_ack_latency from whichever node currently holds the role, so you do not need to know the leader ahead of time.
  • ML anomaly detection on the rate gap and on zk_quorum_ack_latency flags slow-burn divergences before they become sustained stalls.
  • Correlation across nodes lets you put the leader’s quorum signals next to each follower’s zk_fsynctime and zk_jvm_pause_time_ms in one view, which is usually the fastest path to identifying the slow follower.
  • Per-host dashboards make the zxid comparison straightforward, since each node’s zk_zxid is collected alongside its role.